Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/24/1989
Hreha v. Benscoter
Citations
- 554 A.2d 525
- 381 Pa. Super. 556
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 97
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where a business record contains multiple levels of hearsay … it is admissible only if each level falls within a recognized exception to the hearsay rule.”
- discussing required degree of medical certainty necessary to prove causation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, McEwen, Melinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cohen v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-11· cited 66×
- Lira v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-25· cited 55×
- Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-06-29· cited 53×
- Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-07· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-07· cited 41×
- Montgomery v. South Philadelphia Medical Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-21· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. SanchezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-03· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. MunchinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-30· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. EchevarriaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-24· cited 23×
- Hercules v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-23· cited 23×
- Catlin v. HamburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-26· cited 22×
- Birt v. Firstenergy Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-24· cited 17×
- Green Construction Co. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-06-07· cited 14×
- Hammel v. ChristianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-29· cited 13×
- Tarter v. LinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-18· cited 12×
- Municipality of Bethel Park v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-07· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. RiversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-31· cited 9×
- Checchio v. Frankford HospitalPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-01-08
- Evangelista v. SimilaroPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2002-05-24
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 817×
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 562×
- Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 202×
- Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-05· cited 122×
- Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-03-22· cited 117×
- Brannan v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 113×
- Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-01-19· cited 107×
- Bialek v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-05-21· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 88×
- McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-04-22· cited 86×
- Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-24· cited 68×
- Albert v. AlterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-02· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. CooleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 61×
- Gabriel Felice v. The Long Island Railroad CompanySecond Circuit· 1970-02-25· cited 59×
- Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-22· cited 59×
- Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-05-25· cited 59×
- In Re Estate of IndykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 49×
- Riley v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-01-03· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.