Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Parker

Citations

  • 161 A.3d 357
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 132
  • 2017 WL 1548932
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that appellate court could rely on suppression court’s Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion
  • stating that indications that until after Officer Taylor showed up.”
  • interaction was investigative detention where two officers stopped defendant by stationing their bicycles in front of him and suggested that defendant was involved in criminal activity
  • “The combination of the threatening presence of several officers and the indication that appellant was suspected of criminal activity requires the conclusion that a reasonable person would believe that he was not free to leave.”
  • “When the trial court does not enter findings of fact and conclusions of law during suppression proceedings, this Court may garner the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law from its Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Ransom, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.