Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/1/2017
Commonwealth v. Parker
Citations
- 161 A.3d 357
- 2017 Pa. Super. 132
- 2017 WL 1548932
- 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that appellate court could rely on suppression court’s Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion
- stating that indications that until after Officer Taylor showed up.”
- interaction was investigative detention where two officers stopped defendant by stationing their bicycles in front of him and suggested that defendant was involved in criminal activity
- “The combination of the threatening presence of several officers and the indication that appellant was suspected of criminal activity requires the conclusion that a reasonable person would believe that he was not free to leave.”
- “When the trial court does not enter findings of fact and conclusions of law during suppression proceedings, this Court may garner the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law from its Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lazarus, Ransom, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. NewsomeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-07· cited 51×
- Com. v. Thomas, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-04-12· cited 36×
- Com. v. Rice, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-11-07· cited 33×
- Com. v. Singletary, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-12-17· cited 10×
- Com. v. Joyner, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-11-12· cited 1×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- In the Interest of L.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 659×
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-24· cited 408×
- Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-04-23· cited 263×
- Commonwealth v. ReppertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-10· cited 239×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-07-24· cited 211×
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- United States v. Kareem BrownThird Circuit· 2006-05-22· cited 186×
- Commonwealth v. LylesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-21· cited 152×
- Commonwealth v. ClemensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-15· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-07· cited 121×
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-04· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. AuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-04-26· cited 87×
- United States v. Steven E. SapersteinSixth Circuit· 1983-12-08· cited 79×
- Commonwealth v. WallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-13· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-29· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. StevensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-16· cited 62×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-04-01· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. GutierrezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-24· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.