Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jones

Citations

  • 378 A.2d 835
  • 474 Pa. 364
  • 1977 Pa. LEXIS 802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a seizure occurs upon a command to stop from a police officer
  • holding that, in assessing whether there was a detention, the court will view all circumstances (…continued) Constitution, we have always followed Terry in stop and frisk cases. Commonwealth v. Jackson, 698 A.2d 571, 573 (Pa. 1997
  • explaining that “whether a ‘stop’ occurs is not dependent on the presence or absence of any force; rather, it is dependent on the amount of force exercised”
  • finding the officer’s request that an individual be seated in the car supported the conclusion that the individual was seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment because, “while stated as a question, it sought control of [the individual’s] movement”
  • there is nothing in the Constitution which prevents a police officer from approaching a person on the streets-in order to make an inquiry
  • there is nothing in the Constitution which prevents a police officer from approaching a person on the streets in order to make an inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.