Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/7/1977
Commonwealth v. Jones
Citations
- 378 A.2d 835
- 474 Pa. 364
- 1977 Pa. LEXIS 802
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a seizure occurs upon a command to stop from a police officer
- holding that, in assessing whether there was a detention, the court will view all circumstances (…continued) Constitution, we have always followed Terry in stop and frisk cases. Commonwealth v. Jackson, 698 A.2d 571, 573 (Pa. 1997
- explaining that “whether a ‘stop’ occurs is not dependent on the presence or absence of any force; rather, it is dependent on the amount of force exercised”
- finding the officer’s request that an individual be seated in the car supported the conclusion that the individual was seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment because, “while stated as a question, it sought control of [the individual’s] movement”
- there is nothing in the Constitution which prevents a police officer from approaching a person on the streets-in order to make an inquiry
- there is nothing in the Constitution which prevents a police officer from approaching a person on the streets in order to make an inquiry
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-24· cited 408×
- Commonwealth v. ReppertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-10· cited 239×
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-05· cited 211×
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 179×
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-23· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-02-24· cited 109×
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-25· cited 104×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-02-13· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-12· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. DouglassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-14· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-24· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. RansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-08· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-29· cited 69×
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-23· cited 67×
- Waring v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1983-09-09· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. GillespieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-25· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. ArchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-15· cited 56×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- William H. Fuller v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-03-03· cited 199×
- Sheilah C. Hicks v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-07-07· cited 117×
- Commonwealth v. BerriosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-20· cited 117×
- Eugene R. Frazier v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-06-21· cited 80×
- Paul J. Coates, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-04-07· cited 58×
- United States v. McKethanDistrict of Columbia· 1965-11-03· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.