Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Newsome

Citations

  • 170 A.3d 1151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the number of officers present during the interaction” and “the officer’s demeanor” are factors the court may consider in assessing if a seizure occurred
  • stating that “the number of officers present during the interaction” and “the officer’s demeanor” are factors the court may consider in assessing if a seizure occurred
  • emphasizing that “[a]n appellate court must give weight to the specific, reasonable inferences drawn from the facts in light of the officer's experience and acknowledge that innocent facts, when considered collectively, may permit the investigative detention”
  • interaction classified as mere encounter where lieutenant, without activating police cruiser’s lights or siren, asked defendant to stop two or three times without threatening any consequences for non-compliance, did not use authoritative tone, and did not brandish weapon or show force

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubow, Solano, Elliott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Newsome

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.