United States v. Kareem Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Brown was seized prior to his \aborted escape attempt\ and evidence obtained after this seizure was inadmissible
• concluding that Brown was seized prior to his “aborted escape attempt” and evidence obtained after this seizure was inadmissible
• holding that because defendant and companion did not match age, height, or facial features of suspects, police had no reasonable suspicion to stop them
• holding that information from a witness who recently observed the alleged criminal activity is generally viewed as reliable
• holding that “an excessively general description ... does not constitute reasonable suspicion under the ‘narrowly drawn authority’ of Terry v. Ohio.”
• holding that defendant was seized when he submitted to the officer’s show of authority by turning to face the police and placing his hands on the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).