Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Davis

Citations

  • 939 A.2d 905
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 382
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • minor’s testimony regarding alleged sexual abuse was nothing more than a regurgitation of the words, descriptions and concepts that had been suggested to him by the detective, not an independent recollection of the events themselves.
  • discussing pre-trial taint hearings to determine competence of minor victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Bender, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.