· 8/17/2010
Commonwealth v. Mollett
Citations
- 5 A.3d 291
- 2010 Pa. Super. 153
- 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2621
- 2010 WL 3222413
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding pathologist's testimony regarding the timing of gunshots and distance of the firearm \was well within his expertise\
- indicating evidence that a defendant was on parole may tend to establish the defendant's motive to avoid being captured
- finding medical examiner could rely on experience when opining about the position of the shooting victim and the timing of gunshots
- finding it was within former medical examiner’s area of expertise to testify to position of decedent prior to being shot
- finding it was within former medical examiner’s area of expertise to testify to position of decedent prior to being shot
- stating, - 18 - J-A20020-14 g statement constitutes reversible error only if the prosecutor deliberately attempts to appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2011
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowes, Gantman, Panella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.