Skip to main content
· 8/17/2010

Commonwealth v. Mollett

Citations

  • 5 A.3d 291
  • 2010 Pa. Super. 153
  • 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2621
  • 2010 WL 3222413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding pathologist's testimony regarding the timing of gunshots and distance of the firearm \was well within his expertise\
  • indicating evidence that a defendant was on parole may tend to establish the defendant's motive to avoid being captured
  • finding medical examiner could rely on experience when opining about the position of the shooting victim and the timing of gunshots
  • finding it was within former medical examiner’s area of expertise to testify to position of decedent prior to being shot
  • finding it was within former medical examiner’s area of expertise to testify to position of decedent prior to being shot
  • stating, - 18 - J-A20020-14 g statement constitutes reversible error only if the prosecutor deliberately attempts to appeal denied, 14 A.3d 826 (Pa. 2011

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Gantman, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.