Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/16/1999

Commonwealth v. Martin

Citations

727 A.2d 1136
1999 Pa. Super. 29
1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when a Rule 2119(f) statement contains mere incantations of statutory provisions and pronouncements of conclusions of law, it is inadequate
an inquest is only a preliminary investigation and not a trial on the merits; the coroner’s findings are binding on no one as a judgment
when Rule 2119(f) statement “contains incantations of statutory provisions and pronouncements of conclusions of law” it is inadequate
when a Rule 2119(f) statement “contains incantations of statutory provisions and pronouncements of conclusions of law” it is inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Joyce, Lally-Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.