Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 648 A.2d 304
  • 538 Pa. 276
  • 1994 Pa. LEXIS 709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Insurance Department has erected sufficient “walls of division” to comply with due process with regard to the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of alleged insurance law violations
  • explaining that the appearance of bias, partiality, or prejudice Lyness proscribes “must clearly be one that arises from an actual environment of commingled functions. . . . In the absence of any actual commingling . . . due process guarantees are being adequately protected”
  • “a single administrative agency may exercise both prosecutorial and adjudicative functions if ‘walls of separation’ are constructed within an agency that clearly separates those two functions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Gappy, Castille, Montmeuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.