Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/7/2007

Commonwealth v. Taylor

Citations

933 A.2d 1035
2007 Pa. Super. 282
2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the PCRA’s “[s]tatutory time restrictions are mandatory and jurisdictional in nature, and may not be altered or disregarded to reach the merits of the claims raised in the petition”
noting that PCRA evidentiary hearing is not necessary if no genuine issue of material fact exists
stating, “[t]he PCRA specifically provides that a petitioner raising one of the statutory exceptions to the timeliness requirements must affirmatively plead and prove the exception[]”
stating, “[t]he PCRA specifically provides that a petitioner raising one of the statutory exceptions to the timeliness requirements must affirmatively plead and prove the exception[]”
stating, “[t]he PCRA specifically provides that a petitioner raising one of the statutory exceptions to the timeliness requirements must affirmatively plead and prove the exception[]”
arrest hat was no longer part of certified record not newly-discovered fact due to public availability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, McCaffery, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.