Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/9/2013

Commonwealth v. Williams

Citations

73 A.3d 609
2013 Pa. Super. 172
2013 WL 3421984
2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that police need no level of suspicion to approach an individual and initiate a mere encounter or request for information
“This Court is not bound by the rationale of the trial court, and we may affirm the trial court on any basis.”
“This Court is not bound by the rationale of the trial court, and we may affirm the trial court on any basis.”
“This Court is not bound by the rationale of the trial court, and we may affirm the trial court on any basis.”
“This Court is not bound by the rationale of the trial court, and we may affirm the trial court on any basis.”
“This Court is not bound by the rationale of the trial court, and we may affirm the trial court on any basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colville, Files, Lazarus, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.