Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Citations

  • 638 A.2d 940
  • 536 Pa. 153
  • 1994 Pa. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, to be admissible, a prior inconsistent statement must have been uttered under highly reliable circumstances which would render inferences to be drawn from it more probable than not
  • stating that where the Rape Shield Law does not apply, the evidence must be evaluated under the traditional rules of evidence
  • stating that where the Rape Shield Law does not apply, the evidence must be evaluated under the traditional rules of evidence
  • stating that “[t]o be a victim is not ‘conduct’ of the person victimized.”
  • stating that “[t]o be a victim is not ‘conduct’ of the person victimized.”
  • witness may not be cross-examined on collateral matter bearing no relationship to matter on trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Akos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.