Nevada Supreme Court· 9/6/1989

Miller v. State

Citations

779 P.2d 87
105 Nev. 497
1989 Nev. LEXIS 260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

requiring that falsity be established “by a preponderance of the evidence”
creating an exception to rule prohibiting extrinsic evidence if the witness denies fabrication on cross-examination for evidence of prior false accusations in sexual assault cases
discussing that prior to admission of a victim's prior sexual abuse allegation, a defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim made an accusation, the accusation was false, and that the evidence is more probative than prejudicial
requiring threshold showing that prior allegations are false by a preponderance of the evidence
discussing that 24 prior to admission of a victim’s prior sexual abuse allegation, a defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim made an accusation, 25 the accusation was false, and that the evidence is more probative than prejudicial
creating an exception to rule prohibiting extrinsic evidence if the witness denies fabrication on cross- examination for evidence of prior false accusations in sexual assault cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steffen, Springer, Mowbray, Rose, Mosley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.