Commonwealth v. Reefer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that such evidence is properly excluded on grounds of relevancy
• holding that such evidence is properly excluded on grounds of relevancy
• defense sought to introduce evidence that other persons had sexual contact with minor victim for undisclosed reasons
• defense sought to introduce evidence that other persons had sexual contact with minor victim for undisclosed reasons
• testimony concerning sexual contacts not “in any way relevant” to show consent
• testimony concerning sexual contacts not \in any way relevant\ to show consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Thompson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-03· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Wall
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-26· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Boyles
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-29· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Purcell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-21· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Delbridge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-03-08· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Malave
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 1994-08-12

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Durst
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-30· cited 206×
• Commonwealth v. Black
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-11· cited 102×
• Commonwealth v. Cargo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-23· cited 84×
• Commonwealth v. Barnhart
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-08-16· cited 71×
• Commonwealth v. Haight
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-22· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-10-16· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Haight
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-07· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Coia
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-17· cited 15×