Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Pitts

Citations

  • 404 A.2d 1305
  • 486 Pa. 212
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a jury is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence presented
  • stating murder of the third degree does not require a specific intent to kill
  • “Voluntary manslaughter . . . involves the specific intent to kill but, by reason of passion and provocation, contains no legal malice.”
  • jury is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence presented
  • jury is free to believe all, part or none of the evidence presented
  • “Murder of the third degree is a killing done with legal malice but without specific intent to kill. Voluntary manslaughter, on the other hand, involves the specific intent to kill but, by reason of passion and provocation, contains no legal malice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen, Flaherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.