Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Landis

Citations

  • 48 A.3d 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “it is inappropriate for the trial court to make credibility determinations in deciding whether the Commonwealth established a prima facie case.”
  • “[T]he prima facie case merely requires evidence of the existence of each element of the crime charged. . . . The weight and credibility of the evidence is not a factor at this stage.” (cleaned up)
  • “[T]he prima facie case merely requires evidence of the existence of each element of the crime charged. . . . The weight and credibility of the evidence is not a factor at this stage.” (cleaned up)
  • “[T]he prima facie case merely requires evidence of the existence of each element of the crime charged. . . . The weight and credibility of the evidence is not a factor at this stage.” (cleaned up)
  • internal brackets, ellipses, and some citations and quotation marks omitted; citations altered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Bender, Donohue, Files, Mundy, Olson, Ott, Panella, Stevens, Wecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.