Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Saunders

Citations

  • 946 A.2d 776
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 60
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 271
  • 2008 WL 902720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the actions of one co-conspirator may be imputed to another conspirator, and that a conspirator is criminally responsible for those actions of his co-conspirator that are accomplished in furtherance of the common design
  • stating that “the striking of a number of individuals belonging to some cognizable minority group … is - 10 - J-S65037-17 not dispositive that a violation of Batson has occurred.” (citation and brackets omitted)
  • stating, “the striking of a number of individuals belonging to some cognizable minority group… is not dispositive that a violation of Batson has occurred[]”
  • finding Rule 1925(b) statement timely under prisoner mailbox rule based on date of proof of service
  • finding Rule 1925(b) statement timely under prisoner mailbox rule based on date of proof of service
  • finding Rule 1925(b) statement timely under prisoner mailbox rule based on date of proof of service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Musmanno, Hudock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.