Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ramos

Citations

  • 83 A.3d 86
  • 623 Pa. 420
  • 2013 WL 6823036
  • 2013 Pa. LEXIS 3246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the general rule regarding minimum and maximum sentences must yield to 42 Pa.C.S § 9712.1(a)’s offense-specific five-year mandatory minimum, which “applies only to the subset of criminals who have been convicted of 35 P.S. § 780- 113(a)(3
  • holding general provision of 42 Pa.C.S. § 9756(b)(1), requiring minimum sentence not exceed one-half maximum sentence, yields to the specific sentencing provisions
  • stating that marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance under the Drug Act but “it is not a ‘narcotic drug’” under that law
  • ruling that minimum-maximum provision of § 9756(b)(1
  • deriving a statutory maximum for one statute from a different one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Saylor, Stevens, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.