Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Evans

Citations

  • 866 A.2d 442
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 9
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that motion for reconsideration or modification of sentence should be treated as PCRA petition
  • holding that under certain circumstances, an untimely post-sentence motion may be considered a PCRA petition
  • concluding that motion for reconsideration constituted first PCRA petition filed after this Court affirmed the judgment of sentence
  • concluding that a Motion for Reconsideration or Modification of Sentence should be treated as PCRA Petition
  • stating that a motion for reconsideration or modification of sentence was required to be examined under the PCRA
  • declaring that there is “a long line of Pennsylvania precedent requiring unequivocally that prisoners seeking post-conviction relief by whatever name be afforded the assistance of counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Johnson, Klein, Lally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.