Skip to main content
· 3/24/1999

Commonwealth v. Quail

Citations

  • 729 A.2d 571
  • 1999 Pa. Super. 62
  • 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • outlining options to ensure first-time PCRA petitioner is afforded representation through the entire appellate process
  • noting “once counsel has entered an appearance on a defendant’s behalf he is obligated to continue representation until the case is concluded or he is granted leave by the court to withdraw his appearance” (emphasis added)
  • where appointed-counsel abandoned PCRA petitioner without leave of court to withdraw, correct action is to remand pro se appeal for appointment of counsel
  • any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition
  • indigent first-time PCRA petitioner is entitled to representation by counsel
  • indigent first-time PCRA petitioner is entitled to representation by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Melvin, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.