· 3/24/1999
Commonwealth v. Quail
Citations
- 729 A.2d 571
- 1999 Pa. Super. 62
- 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- outlining options to ensure first-time PCRA petitioner is afforded representation through the entire appellate process
- noting “once counsel has entered an appearance on a defendant’s behalf he is obligated to continue representation until the case is concluded or he is granted leave by the court to withdraw his appearance” (emphasis added)
- where appointed-counsel abandoned PCRA petitioner without leave of court to withdraw, correct action is to remand pro se appeal for appointment of counsel
- any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition
- indigent first-time PCRA petitioner is entitled to representation by counsel
- indigent first-time PCRA petitioner is entitled to representation by counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Melvin, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.