Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/27/2001
Commonwealth v. Crawford
Citations
- 789 A.2d 266
- 2001 Pa. Super. 373
- 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a brief that was not docketed, not formally filed with the court, not required by a rule of criminal procedure, and not part of the record on appeal was not a public judicial document
- noting that a brief that was not docketed, not formally filed with the court, not required by a rule of criminal procedure, and not part of the record on appeal was not a public judicial document
- finding Commonwealth's pretrial brief was not a public judicial document where it was not filed of record
- stating a newspaper “sought access as intervenors to the Commonwealth’s brief” and “[a]fter a hearing, the trial court refused [the newspaper’s] requests”
- “When [the a]ppellants’ petition to intervene was denied, their recourse was to argue on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to grant them intervenor status.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sole, Cavanaugh, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MartinezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-02-06· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. FinleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-09· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. CurleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-04· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. UpshurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-22· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-31· cited 5×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 4,546×
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 1,758×
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 288×
- South Whitehall Township Police Service v. South Whitehall TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-03· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. FenstermakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-25· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-01· cited 64×
- Ken R. on Behalf of CR v. ARTHUR Z.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-04· cited 57×
- Franklin Township v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ResourcesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-01· cited 53×
- Franklin Tp. v. COM., DEPT. OF ENV. RESOURCESSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-01· cited 50×
- Capital Cities Media, Inc. v. TooleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-14· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-24· cited 40×
- Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-01· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-17· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.