Skip to main content
· 12/23/1994

Ken R. on Behalf of CR v. ARTHUR Z.

Citations

  • 651 A.2d 1119
  • 438 Pa. Super. 114
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although a sibling relationship is of utmost importance, appellant did not have standing to seek custody or visitation with her siblings because “a moral or a personal interest is not a legal interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Olszewski, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.