Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/17/1998
Commonwealth v. Lambert
Citations
- 723 A.2d 684
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding a gag order met the collateral order doctrine
- finding Rule 3.6 not unconstitutionally vague
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hupock, Johnson, Hudock, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 1,758×
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 552×
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 288×
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 163×
- Basile v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-22· cited 151×
- Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-10-26· cited 134×
- Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. McCullumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-21· cited 96×
- In Re HasaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-11-03· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. CasperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-06-29· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.