Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Buehl

Citations

  • 462 A.2d 1316
  • 316 Pa. Super. 215
  • 9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1896
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “a case is capable of repetition, yet evading review[,] when (1
  • stating issue is “capable of repetition, yet evading review” when “(1) the challenged action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration, and (2
  • stating -7- J-A13036-22 issue is “capable of repetition, yet evading review” when “(1) the challenged action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration, and (2
  • stating issue is “capable of repetition, yet evading review” when “(1) the challenged -5- J-S07040-25 action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration, and (2
  • closure of pretrial hearing in criminal case limited by First Amendment access rights of the public
  • closure of pretrial hearing in criminal case limited by First Amendment access rights of the public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Cavanaugh and Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.