Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/12/2007
Commonwealth v. Murray
Citations
- 936 A.2d 76
- 2007 Pa. Super. 307
- 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3223
- 2007 WL 2966428
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, “under limited circumstances police are justified in investigating a situation, so long as the police officers reasonably believe that criminal activity is afoot”
- stating that Murray argued that “the circumstances of the traffic stop failed to provide the officer with a reasonable belief that he was dangerous so as to justify a search”
- holding police had reasonable suspicion where traffic stop occurred at night and in high-narcotics area, defendant’s vehicle had tinted windows, and defendant made “a lot of movement in the vehicle” as officer was approaching
- determining protective search of vehicle was proper where officers stopped appellant for motor vehicle violation, in high crime area, and officers saw “excessive movement” inside car
- finding reasonable suspicion where traffic stop occurred at night and in high-narcotics area, defendant’s vehicle had tinted windows, and defendant made “a lot of movement in the vehicle” as officer was approaching
- finding reasonable suspicion where traffic stop occurred at night and in high-narcotics area, defendant’s vehicle had tinted windows, and defendant made “a lot of movement in the vehicle” as officer was approaching
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joyce, Panella, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-21· cited 116×
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-10· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. CartagenaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-01-23· cited 88×
- In the Interest of O.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-01· cited 75×
- Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-04-19· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. BuchertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-12· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-07· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-10· cited 15×
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-12-13· cited 9×
- In Re OJSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-01· cited 3×
- Com. v. Arrington, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-06-09· cited 1×
- Com. v. Gibson, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-03-19
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- United States v. Ricky A. CaruthersSixth Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 258×
- Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-23· cited 242×
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-01· cited 87×
- United States v. Billy Howard StanfieldFourth Circuit· 1997-03-31· cited 76×
- United States v. Kenneth D. EvansSeventh Circuit· 1993-06-08· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. MelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-09· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. MesaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-23· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. KondashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-30· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-25· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. McAlileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-05· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.