Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Guess

Citations

  • 53 A.3d 895
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 196
  • 2012 WL 4017947
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting ineffectiveness claim where the Commonwealth introduced testimony by police detective referencing defendant’s silence “for the narrow purpose of describing the extent and focus of his investigation, not as substantive evidence of guilt”
  • where police 2 Because the interaction constituted a mere encounter, Linnen was not entitled to receive Miranda warnings. See Commonwealth v. Garvin, 50 A.3d 694, 698 (Pa. Super. 2012
  • “[e]xamples of circumstances that might indicate a seizure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Platt, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.