Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/20/1985
Commonwealth v. Murray
Citations
- 502 A.2d 624
- 348 Pa. Super. 439
- 12 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1545
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that security concerns were an insufficient reason to order closure of a preliminary hearing in light of the constitutional guarantee of a public trial
- “Logically, a new preliminary hearing is foolish once the evidentiary trial is - 12 - J-A13019-17 completed without reversible error.”
- dicta, a “compelling interest is required”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. TylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-26· cited 79×
- Commonwealth v. AtkinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-10· cited 47×
- Hutchison by Hutchison v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-07-02· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. FewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-10· cited 43×
- State v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. TroopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-09· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. OwensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-10-13· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. PennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-07· cited 22×
- In the Interest of M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-26· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. UpshurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-22· cited 5×
- In Re MBSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-02-26
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsCambria County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-12-21
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 1,561×
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-05-23· cited 408×
- United States v. KobliThird Circuit· 1949-02-03· cited 146×
- United States v. CianfraniThird Circuit· 1978-03-16· cited 136×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Edward Bennett No. H-6720 v. Alfred T. Rundle, Warden of Eastern Correctional Institute, Graterford, PaThird Circuit· 1970-01-14· cited 130×
- Commonwealth v. KnightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-20· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-24· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. ContakosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-01· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-06-20· cited 21×
- Petition of Daily ItemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-11· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. FlandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.