Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Murray

Citations

  • 502 A.2d 624
  • 348 Pa. Super. 439
  • 12 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1545
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that security concerns were an insufficient reason to order closure of a preliminary hearing in light of the constitutional guarantee of a public trial
  • “Logically, a new preliminary hearing is foolish once the evidentiary trial is - 12 - J-A13019-17 completed without reversible error.”
  • dicta, a “compelling interest is required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.