Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/12/1990
Commonwealth v. Ramos
Citations
- 573 A.2d 1027
- 392 Pa. Super. 583
- 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant’s possession of nine individually prepackaged rocks of crack cocaine coupled with defendant’s act of placing the drugs beneath a parked car was sufficient evidence of an intent to deliver
- holding that the defendant's possession of nine individually prepackaged rocks of crack cocaine coupled with defendant's act of placing the drugs beneath a parked car was sufficient evidence of an intent to deliver
- holding that the defendant’s possession of nine individually prepackaged rocks of crack cocaine coupled with defendant’s act of placing the drugs beneath a parked ear was sufficient evidence of an intent to deliver
- nine individually prepackaged rocks of crack cocaine coupled with defendants act of placing drug beneath a parked car was sufficient evidence of an intent to deliver
- nine (9) heat-sealed pre-packaged plastic packets of cocaine, when coupled with defendant’s actions in placing the drugs beneath a parked car, sufficiently proved an intent to deliver
- evidence sufficient to establish intent to deliver where the cocaine was divided into nine (9) pre-packaged heat-sealed plastic packets, a form which was typical of juvenile drug sales
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tamilia, Kelly, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. AguadoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-06· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. AriondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-31· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. ConawaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-01-15· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. TorresSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-17· cited 36×
- State v. ZunkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-06· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-17· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. OcasioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-19· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-14· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-05· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. GippleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-15· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-14· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-22· cited 13×
- In the Interest of EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-31· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. SherrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-30· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-11-07· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-24· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. RatsamySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-18· cited 8×
- State Of Washington V. Benjamin Jack HooverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2025-12-22
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-27· cited 227×
- United States v. Henry Carter, A/K/A A.B. Lay A/K/A Prince, Tracy Lynn Jones, and Sheila Marie O'MearaEighth Circuit· 1988-09-22· cited 74×
- United States v. Victor Manuel Valencia-RoldanNinth Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. PearsallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-18· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-14· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. SmagalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-24· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. BagleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-26· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. KarnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-11-14· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. PaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-03· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-08· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.