Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Potter

Citations

  • 504 A.2d 243
  • 350 Pa. Super. 61
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia where recovered items had commonly - 19 - J-A32035-16 recognized drug-related function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Cirillo, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.