Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Irwin

Citations

  • 579 A.2d 955
  • 397 Pa. Super. 109
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “a trial judge [as opposed to a jury] is capable of recognizing in himself the symptoms of bias and impartiality.”
  • judges sitting as factfinders are presumed to ignore prejudicial evidence in reaching a verdict; a trial judge is presumed capable of recognizing in himself the symptoms of bias
  • court sitting as fact-finder in a nonjury trial is presumed to disregard irrelevant and prejudicial aspects of relevant evidence
  • “[i]t has long been held that trial judges, sitting as factfinders, are presumed to ignore prejudicial evidence in reaching a verdict”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Elliott, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.