Skip to main content

Colwell v. State

Citations

  • 544 S.E.2d 120
  • 273 Ga. 634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court had “properly respected Colwell’s right to make the ‘ultimate decision about’ what sort of case to present” (citation omitted)
  • holding that the trial court had \properly respected Colwell's right to make the `ultimate decision about' what sort of case to present\ (citation omitted)
  • stating defendant was “sentenced to death because of the nature of his crimes, not because of his own desire to die”
  • finding a defendant’s two death sentences were not disproportionate punishment where the defendant suffered from mental illness but where nothing in the record suggested that he was incapable of perceiving right and wrong or of understanding the consequences of his actions
  • “In the absence of admissible evidence demanding a different result, the trial court did not err in declining to declare execution by electrocution unconstitutional.”
  • “[i]n the absence of admissible evidence demanding a different result, the trial court did not err in declining to declare execution by electrocution unconstitutional”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Sears, Divisions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.