Skip to main content

Coleman v. State

Citations

  • 610 So. 2d 1283
  • 1992 WL 382176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving instruction to jurors that they must \rely on their recollection of the evidence\ in response to jury question pertaining to testimonial fact evidence
  • “the jury’s question regarding whether the vaginal swabs taken from the sexual battery victims matched the defendant’s DNA” was a factual question
  • \A trial court ... has wide discretion in deciding whether to have testimony reread.\
  • the trial court “did not abuse its discretion when [it] advised the jurors . . . to rely on their collective recollection of the evidence[]” “because the jury question involved matters of fact, not questions of law[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.