Skip to main content

Gordon v. State

Citations

  • 863 So. 2d 1215
  • 2003 WL 22964723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that police officer's comparison of locations on cell phone records to locations on cell site maps did not constitute expert testimony
  • stating that testimony about cell phone records and comparing them to locations on cell site maps was not expert testimony and was properly admitted
  • stating that testimony about cell phone records and comparing them to locations on cell site maps was not expert testimony and was properly admitted
  • holding witness testimony factually explaining contents of phone record and comparing the locations on the phone records to the cell site maps was not expert testimony
  • holding alleged violation of Vienna Convention was procedurally barred where not raised on direct appeal, and petitioner failed to establish he had standing to assert such claim
  • explaining counsel cannot be deemed to be ineffective for failing to raise claim that would have been futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.