Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 653 So. 2d 362
  • 1994 WL 684008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, where defendant “freely and voluntarily provided [detectives] with hair and blood samples. . . . the samples were validly obtained, albeit in an unrelated case, [and] the police were not restrained from using the samples as evidence in the murder case”
  • finding that, 3 while the use of a single photograph to obtain an identification was unduly suggestive, the witness’s familiarity with the defendant provided an independent basis for identification, uninfluenced by the suggestive procedure
  • upholding state's peremptory challenge of African-American juror based on opposition to death penalty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.