Ninth Circuit· 9/22/2011

Cole v. Holder

Citations

659 F.3d 762
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19402
2011 WL 4395622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where it is clear that the BIA considered evidence, the BIA need not discuss all nondispositive evidence
holding that a BIA decision “cannot stand” where it “misstat[es] the record and fail[s] to mention highly probative or potentially dispositive evidence”
holding that the agency must consider all evidence relevant to the possibility of future torture
holding that the BIA’s decision cannot stand when it fails to mention highly probative or potentially disposi-tive evidence
holding that “misstating the record and failing to mention highly probative or potentially dispositive evidence” indicates that the agency failed to consider all the evidence
holding that the BIA’s decision cannot stand when it fails to mention highly probative or potentially dispositive evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Berzon, Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cole v. Holder

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.