Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 1/18/2013

Anthony Alphonsus v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Citations

  • 705 F.3d 1031
  • 2013 WL 208930
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Board must provide reasons for treating factually identical cases differently
  • holding that the particularly serious crime statute is not unconstitutionally vague
  • recognizing “that harm to persons is the usual requisite danger” relevant in a particularly serious crime analysis
  • explaining that the BIA must “adequately elucidate[e] [a] rationale for applying the particularly serious crime bar”
  • explaining that the BIA may “use its expertise” in considering contradictory and ambiguous records
  • finding no intent to harm either the arresting officer or members of the public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Graber, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.