Victor Tapia Madrigal v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CAT relief requires a showing of acquiescence to petitioner’s alleged torture by a public official
• holding that the BIA erred by “focus[ing] only on the Mexican government’s willingness to control Los Zetas, not its ability to do so”
• holding that “mistreatment motivated purely by personal retribution will not give rise to a valid asylum claim”
• holding that “mistreatment motivated purely by personal retribution will not give rise to a valid asylum claim”
• holding that the agency erred by focusing “only on the Mexican government’s willingness to control Los Zetas, not its ability to do so”
• holding that the Board committed legal error by focusing solely on a government’s willingness, but not its ability, to control private persecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).