Aguilar-Ramos v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the BIA’s failure to consider country-condition evidence that was “included in the record without objection” is reversible error
• holding it is reversible error only where the BIA and immigration judge fail to consider relevant evidence
• observing that “[a]n expert is permitted to base his opinion on hearsay evidence and need not have personal knowledge of the facts underlying his opinion”
• holding that “awareness and willful blindness [of torture] will suffice.”
• noting that at bond hearing government bears the burden of establishing that the alien is a 12 flight risk or a danger to the community
• noting that “[c]ountry reports are accorded special weight in removal proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).