Skip to main content
· 12/11/2007

Coefield v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.

Citations

  • 532 F. Supp. 2d 685
  • 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2439
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90844
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,057
  • 2007 WL 4365333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing background case law rejecting LMRA preemption of NJLAD claims, but then proceeding to state that “[w]ith this background, the Court now turns to each of Plaintiff's claims to determine whether they require interpretation of the CBA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.