District of Columbia· 2/7/2005
Cobell v. Norton
Citations
- 355 F. Supp. 2d 531
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1616
- 2005 WL 281139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that courts have discretion to determine “whether reconsideration is necessary under the relevant circumstances”
- describing the court’s inquiry as “whether reconsideration is necessary under the relevant circumstances”
- “Rule 54(b) governs reconsideration of orders that do not constitute final judgments in a case.”
- “Rule 54(b) governs reconsideration of orders that do not constitute final judgments in a case.”
- “In order for justice to require reconsideration, logically, it must be the case that, some sort of ‘injustice’ will result if reconsideration is refused.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
147 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2005-08-23· cited 251×
- United States v. SuniaDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-11· cited 101×
- In Defense of Animals v. National Institutes of HealthDistrict of Columbia· 2008-04-14· cited 74×
- Isse v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2008-04-14· cited 54×
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-09· cited 38×
- Cobell, Elouise P. v. Kempthorne, DirkD.C. Circuit· 2006-07-11· cited 35×
- Lewis v. Executive Office for United State AttorneysDistrict of Columbia· 2011-11-03· cited 33×
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.D.C. Circuit· 2018-04-23· cited 32×
- City of Moundridge v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District of Columbia· 2008-04-16· cited 32×
- Wildearth Guardians v. SalazarDistrict of Columbia· 2010-12-06· cited 30×
- Loumiet v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2014-08-21· cited 30×
- Dl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2011-05-09· cited 29×
- United States v. Dynamic Visions, Inc.District of Columbia· 2017-04-24· cited 23×
- Negley v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2011-08-31· cited 21×
- United States v. CoughlinDistrict of Columbia· 2011-07-06· cited 21×
- University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-19· cited 20×
- Dunlap v. Presidential Advisory Comm'n on Election IntegrityD.C. Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 20×
- Belmont Holdings Corp. v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2012-08-28· cited 20×
- United States v. SlattenDistrict of Columbia· 2014-07-29· cited 17×
- United States v. Hong VoDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-23· cited 16×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-11-15· cited 2,273×
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 1,015×
- Bank of Waunakee, a Wisconsin Banking Corporation v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1990-07-13· cited 556×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2004-10-22· cited 207×
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 199×
- Motorola, Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mechanical Contractors, Inc.D. Arizona· 2003-06-18· cited 140×
- Cleo Syrup Corporation v. Coca-Cola Co.Eighth Circuit· 1943-12-28· cited 139×
- Childers v. SlaterDistrict of Columbia· 2000-09-18· cited 108×
- Moore v. HartmanDistrict of Columbia· 2004-08-30· cited 36×
- Campbell v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2002-06-20· cited 33×
- Duke v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1937-06-14· cited 26×
- Gallant v. Telebrands Corp.D. New Jersey· 1998-12-22· cited 19×
- M.K. v. TenetDistrict of Columbia· 2001-12-03· cited 19×
- Whitfield v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1876-05-18· cited 17×
- United States Ex Rel. Haskins v. Omega Institute, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1998-11-19· cited 10×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-17· cited 10×
- Cobell v. NortonD.C. Circuit· 2004-11-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.