Lewis v. Executive Office for United State Attorneys

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that names and \personally identifiable information\ of certain personnel were properly withheld under Exemption 6
• denying Federal Rule 54(b) relief based on new evidence when that new evidence has no bearing on the reason trial court dismissed the case
• “Neither the EOUSA nor the USAO-FLM ‘controls’ documents filed in and maintained by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.”
• “Furthermore, neither the federal courts nor state courts are subject to the FOIA.” citing 5 U.S.C. §551(1)(B)
• “Information protected under Exemption 6 includes such items as a person’s name, address, place of birth, 10 employment history, and telephone number.”
• “Information protected under Exemption 6 includes such items as a person’s name, address, place of birth, 10 Case 1:12-cv-00843-ESH Document 106 Filed 02/05/16 Page 11 of 12 employment history, and telephone number.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).