District of Columbia· 8/11/2009
United States v. Sunia
Citations
- 643 F. Supp. 2d 51
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71622
- 2009 WL 2447367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding dismissal not required “so long as some part of the criminal conduct alleged occurred within the timeframe of the applicable statute of limitations”
- holding dismissal not required “so long as some part of the criminal conduct alleged occurred within the timeframe of the applicable statute of limitations”
- holding dismissal not required “so long as some part of the criminal conduct alleged occurred within the timeframe of the applicable statute of limitations”
- acknowledging that \a legislator who misuses his legislative authority to facilitate corrupt practices affecting agency programs that receive federal funds may well fall within the ambit of § 666\
- applying “as justice requires” standard to similar motion for reconsideration after denial of motion to dismiss
- listing criminal cases applying standards from Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in reconsideration context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reggie B. Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Eddie TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-06-23· cited 164×
- United States v. Martinez-MaldonadoFirst Circuit· 2013-06-26· cited 59×
- United States v. Sanford, Ltd.District of Columbia· 2012-05-14· cited 45×
- United States v. Dawkins, CodeSecond Circuit· 2021-06-04· cited 31×
- United States v. Mosquera-MurilloDistrict of Columbia· 2015-12-14· cited 30×
- United States v. CoughlinDistrict of Columbia· 2011-07-06· cited 21×
- United States v. CabreraDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-29· cited 20×
- United States v. HillieDistrict of Columbia· 2017-01-05· cited 19×
- United States v. SlattenDistrict of Columbia· 2014-07-29· cited 17×
- United States v. Hong VoDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-23· cited 16×
- United States v. Hasston, Inc.District of Columbia· 2015-11-19· cited 15×
- United States v. SampsonSecond Circuit· 2018-08-06· cited 15×
- United States v. HemingwayDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-13· cited 13×
- United States v. Valderrama CarvajalDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-20· cited 11×
- United States v. HillieD.C. Circuit· 2018-01-29· cited 11×
- United States v. Bravo-FernandezD. Puerto Rico· 2011-12-12· cited 9×
- United States v. HanDistrict of Columbia· 2017-12-01· cited 8×
- Benoit O. Brookens, II v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-04-05· cited 7×
- United States v. TajideenD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-10· cited 7×
- United States v. AliDistrict of Columbia· 2012-07-13· cited 6×
Cites
78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,073×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 1,506×
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,277×
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-01-11· cited 1,218×
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 1,097×
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court· 2002-02-19· cited 1,044×
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-02· cited 1,039×
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-03-02· cited 806×
- Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-06-20· cited 587×
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court· 1997-02-26· cited 565×
- Sabri v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-05-17· cited 466×
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court· 1976-10-12· cited 406×
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 398×
- United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 368×
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeD.C. Circuit· 1987-09-25· cited 309×
- United States v. HealySupreme Court· 1964-02-17· cited 295×
- Burgess v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 267×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.