· 8/11/2009
United States v. Sunia
Citations
- 643 F. Supp. 2d 51
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71622
- 2009 WL 2447367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding dismissal not required “so long as some part of the criminal conduct alleged occurred within the timeframe of the applicable statute of limitations”
- holding dismissal not required “so long as some part of the criminal conduct alleged occurred within the timeframe of the applicable statute of limitations”
- holding dismissal not required “so long as some part of the criminal conduct alleged occurred within the timeframe of the applicable statute of limitations”
- acknowledging that \a legislator who misuses his legislative authority to facilitate corrupt practices affecting agency programs that receive federal funds may well fall within the ambit of § 666\
- applying “as justice requires” standard to similar motion for reconsideration after denial of motion to dismiss
- listing criminal cases applying standards from Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in reconsideration context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reggie B. Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.