Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the moving party “may not advance new facts, issues or arguments not previously presented to the Court.”
• stating that, where a notice of appeal “fail[s] to mention” a specific order, we are “bar[red] from considering” an appellate challenge to that order
• stating that, where a notice of appeal “fail[s] to mention” a specific order, we are “bar[red] from considering” an appellate challenge to that order
• noting that the “[t]he standard for granting [a reconsideration] motion is strict . . . .”
• noting that the “[t]he standard for granting [a reconsideration] motion is strict . . . .”
• stating that reconsideration “should not be granted where the moving party seeks solely to relitigate an issue already decided”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).