Second Circuit· 11/15/1995
Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.
Citations
- 70 F.3d 255
- 1995 WL 678755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the moving party “may not advance new facts, issues or arguments not previously presented to the Court.”
- stating that, where a notice of appeal “fail[s] to mention” a specific order, we are “bar[red] from considering” an appellate challenge to that order
- stating that, where a notice of appeal “fail[s] to mention” a specific order, we are “bar[red] from considering” an appellate challenge to that order
- noting that the “[t]he standard for granting [a reconsideration] motion is strict . . . .”
- noting that the “[t]he standard for granting [a reconsideration] motion is strict . . . .”
- stating that reconsideration “should not be granted where the moving party seeks solely to relitigate an issue already decided”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Oakes, Calabresi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
461 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Meilleur v. StrongSecond Circuit· 2012-05-24· cited 1,879×
- Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Second Circuit· 2012-06-04· cited 1,045×
- Van Buskirk v. The United Group of CompaniesSecond Circuit· 2019-08-16· cited 368×
- Peter F. Gaito Architecture, LLC v. Simone Development Corp.Second Circuit· 2010-04-07· cited 305×
- Sacerdote v. New York UniversitySecond Circuit· 2021-08-16· cited 299×
- Sikhs for Justice v. NathS.D. New York· 2012-09-21· cited 267×
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2005-08-23· cited 251×
- John Chang v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 249×
- United States v. Carol BaylessSecond Circuit· 2000-01-18· cited 243×
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-09-10· cited 171×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2005-02-07· cited 158×
- Kovaco v. Rockbestos-Surprenant Cable Corp.Second Circuit· 2016-08-22· cited 153×
- Songbyrd, Inc. v. Estate of Albert B. Grossman, Doing Business as Bearsville Records, Inc.Second Circuit· 2000-03-10· cited 138×
- In Re: Bdc 56 Llc, Debtor. Key Mechanical Inc. v. Bdc 56 Llc, Dwf Inc., Mesta Construction, Inc.Second Circuit· 2003-05-21· cited 133×
- Swatch Group Management Services Ltd. v. Bloomberg L.P.Second Circuit· 2014-01-27· cited 119×
- Berman v. SUGO LLCS.D. New York· 2008-08-05· cited 118×
- Davidson v. ScullyS.D. New York· 2001-11-05· cited 117×
- City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits. Com, Inc.Second Circuit· 2008-09-02· cited 115×
- \ R\ BEST PRODUCE, INC. v. DiSapioSecond Circuit· 2008-08-26· cited 107×
- 4 Pillar Dynasty LLC v. New York & Co., Inc.Second Circuit· 2019-08-08· cited 102×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schonberger v. SerchukS.D. New York· 1990-08-02· cited 119×
- Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyNinth Circuit· 1986-09-12· cited 87×
- United States v. SchwimmerSecond Circuit· 1992-07-13· cited 60×
- Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 59×
- Adams v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1988-04-18· cited 50×
- Benjamin v. Traffic Executive Ass'n Eastern RailroadsSecond Circuit· 1989-02-21· cited 40×
- Charles H. Landfried, Sr., James A. Rash, and William E. Jackson v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, a CorporationEighth Circuit· 1983-11-22· cited 37×
- Armando Gonzalez v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyFifth Circuit· 1985-10-15· cited 35×
- Daniel E. Mayon v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyFifth Circuit· 1986-12-17· cited 22×
- James E. Bielicke, Marvin M. Walz, Steven L. Helton and Joseph Smith v. Terminal Railroad Association, a CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1994-07-26· cited 15×
- Armando Gonzalez v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyFifth Circuit· 1985-03-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.