Skip to main content

Childers v. Slater

Citations

  • 197 F.R.D. 185
  • 48 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 396
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17019
  • 2000 WL 1724527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “pro se litigants generally are entitled to wider latitude than those who are represented by counsel”
  • noting that \interlocutory judgments [like those for partial summary judgment] ... are left subject to the complete power of the court rendering them to afford such relief from them as justice requires\
  • “not everything that makes an employee unhappy is an actionable adverse action”
  • “[I]nterlocutory judgments are not brought within the restrictions of [Rule 60(b
  • listing factors relevant to reopening discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Childers v. Slater

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.