Hill v. Bloom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing “[w]hether a moving party has made a prima facie showing sufficient to justify . . . a child support modification hearing” (first alteration in original) (quoting Harrington v. Jordan, 984 P.2d 1, 3 (Alaska 1999))
• \Hill's actual income for the first half of 2008 did not make a prima facie showing for modification of child support given the relatively short amount of time that passed between the evidentiary hearing and the motion to modify.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).