Neal & Co. v. Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no abuse of discretion when trial court declined to reconsider ruling based upon evidence that was not before it at the time it rendered its decision, and moving party offered no explanation for failing to present evidence earlier
• describing purpose of reconsideration motion as “to remedy mistakes in judicial decision-making where grounds exist,” but not as “a means to seek an extension of time for the presentation of additional evidence on the merits of the claim”
• oral representations at a prebid conference did not alter the written terms of a construction contract
• “We refuse to allow a motion for reconsideration to be used as a means to seek an extension of time for the presentation of additional evidence on the merits of the claim.”
• \We refuse to allow a motion for reconsideration to be used as a means to seek an extension of time for the presentation of additional evidence on the merits of the claim.\
• \'We refuse to allow a motion for reconsideration to be used as a means to seek an extension of time for the presentation of additional evidence on the merits of the claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).