Skip to main content
· 9/14/2005

CIVIX-DDI, LLC v. Cellco Partnership

Citations

  • 387 F. Supp. 2d 869
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20265
  • 2005 WL 2266621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that parties are not entitled to summary judgment on unasserted claims
  • “Civix [was] undeniably] familiar[] with the events in the Colorado and NavTech litigation.”
  • “Because the asserted patents did not exist at the time of [the alleged notice], it is impossible for that [notice] to communicate the specific charge of infringement required by the Federal Circuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: St. Eve

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.