Critikon, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “patentee facing a high level of materiality and clear proof that it knew or should have known of that materiality, can expect to find it difficult to establish ‘subjective good faith’ sufficient to prevent the drawing of an inference of intent to mislead”
• “No single factor or combination of factors can be said always to require an inference of intent to mislead[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).