National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The West Bend Company, Defendant/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury verdict must be sustained if it is supported by substantial evidence based on a review of the entirety of the record
• concluding \that as a matter of law § 271(b) does not reach actions taken before issuance of the adverse patent\
• inducing act must occur after patent issues to support inducement liability; not enough that induced act occurs after issuance
• affirming district court’s exclusion of evidence as settlement negotiations subject to Fed. R. Evid. 408
• “[I]n deciding a motion for summary judgment of invalidity the [heightened] burden of proof [of clear and convincing evidence] must be considered.”
• “in deciding a motion for summary judgment of invalidity the [heightened] burden of proof [of clear and convincing evidence] must be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).