Skip to main content
· 9/19/1986

Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.

Citations

  • 802 F.2d 1367
  • 231 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 81
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding corroborative value in research notebooks that were either contemporaneously signed and witnessed, or prudently witnessed by other researchers within a reasonable time thereafter
  • Federal Circuit reversed lower court’s finding that laboratory notebooks and internal documents witnessed months later failed to corroborate the inventor’s claimed invention
  • inventor testimony of conception was sufficiently corroborated by inventor's laboratory notebook in which some entries were witnessed before the critical date but others were not
  • “[A] patent need not teach, and preferably omits, what is well known in the art.”
  • “[A] patent need not teach, and preferably omits, what is well known in the art.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Davis, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.